<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Conklin Technology Group, LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conklintechnology.com/site/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conklintechnology.com/site</link>
	<description>IT Architecture.  Identity Management.  Unix Administration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft&#8217;s Next Generation Active Directory by Stu Buttler</title>
		<link>http://conklintechnology.com/site/2009/11/18/microsofts-next-generation-active-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Buttler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conklintechnology.com/site/?p=42#comment-508</guid>
		<description>There won&#039;t be any real benefits...  going relational from a non-relational data model...  It&#039;s Oracle OID all over again.  Ugh - LDAP is what it is - get over it and move along people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There won&#8217;t be any real benefits&#8230;  going relational from a non-relational data model&#8230;  It&#8217;s Oracle OID all over again.  Ugh &#8211; LDAP is what it is &#8211; get over it and move along people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
